Witipedia:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions

Administrators are elected here. Any registered editor may nominate another, or themselves. Discussion runs for seven days, after which a bureaucrat closes it. The rough threshold is 70% support, but a bureaucrat weighs arguments rather than counting heads.

Administrators can protect pages, delete pages and block accounts. They have '''no''' additional authority over content: an admin who loses a content argument has lost it.

== What people are actually assessed on ==

* Edit history, particularly talk-page behaviour under disagreement

* Whether they revert with a reason

* Whether they can tell the difference between an unfunny article and an article whose jokes they personally did not enjoy

That last one is the job.

== Open nominations ==

=== CiteOrDie ===

'''Support.''' Reverts vandalism within minutes, always leaves a summary, and removed their own joke from [[Platypus]] when it was shown to be unsourced. [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 10:22, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

: '''Support.''' The [[Talk:Platypus]] thread is the best argument anyone could make for their own nomination. [[User:MonotremeMary|MonotremeMary]] ([[User talk:MonotremeMary|talk]]) 11:04, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

=== Thoenfan ===

'''Neutral.''' Excellent sourcing, but three reverts in one hour on [[Mantis shrimp]] without using the talk page. Ask again in a month. [[User:Ornithopod|Ornithopod]] ([[User talk:Ornithopod|talk]]) 18:40, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

: That is fair. Withdrawing for now. [[User:Thoenfan|Thoenfan]] ([[User talk:Thoenfan|talk]]) 20:15, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

[[Category:Witipedia]]